Comments for BlOrg Theory

Comment on Lou Pai: The Only Guy Who’s Ever Been Lucky to Get Divorced by Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 25 Nov 2011 05:57:57 +0000

Where are the untouchable vigilantes out there? Secret Masonic-like super hero ninjas who will slip into his evil world and finish hi moogooguypan. Evil chink.

Comment on Weick on Organizations as Nouns by kansas reflections

kansas reflections — Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:51:54 +0000

[...] Weick on Organizations as Nouns (blorgtheory.com) [...]

Comment on Updating Political Power by Heartless Capitalist

Heartless Capitalist — Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:02:16 +0000

I agree that this would be an interesting approach, as it would essentially “level the playing field” for all parties involved–candidates and constituent groups. The question now, if moving forward with your proposal, is: what about Political Action Committees and other politically focused organizations? Are they to be banned from spending on specific candidates? What about specific causes/issues?

Comment on Revisiting Informal Group Power by How big is your network? | Biz Gov Soc

How big is your network? | Biz Gov Soc — Wed, 05 Oct 2011 02:03:05 +0000

[...] 5, 2011 by meghancrawford Looking through an older BU blog I came across an interesting post Revisiting Informal Group Power. This post describes the connection between power and informal groups. Power in a formal group is [...]

Comment on Updating Political Power by Karl Marx | Biz Gov Soc

Karl Marx | Biz Gov Soc — Tue, 04 Oct 2011 23:39:38 +0000

[...] Capitalist’s comments on the cohesion of politicians and wealthy elites in the blog Updating Political Power mirror a discussion of Karl Marx and the role of government in a capitalist society. Heartless [...]

Comment on Updating Political Power by MDHarbin

MDHarbin — Tue, 04 Oct 2011 22:57:01 +0000

Its crazy how capitalism offers the unique opportunity for business leaders to bribe politicians with campaign money who are in favor of pro business policies. After copious donations, politicians have the tricky job of balancing election votes from the general populous with the interests of donating elite. Its not always clear how much money politicians receive from each donor, but businesses offer up millions of dollars, as in the case of Goldman Sachs, to political figures, who align with current business interests. To address the question: “at what point do normal, rational, constituent-based concerns trump the business elite’s interests?” – Although I strongly agree with your two scenarios, I’d have to pose a third solution… take money out of politics. Its of course easier said than done, but its interesting to imagine a world where politicians are focused on votes rather than rubbing elbow with the rich and famous.

Comment on Blame it on the Beard by “Blame it on the Beard”… More Women Should be on Wallstreet | Biz Gov Soc

Tue, 04 Oct 2011 18:44:04 +0000

[...] Theory blog site from one of Jordi’s previous classes, I came across a blog entitled “Blame it on the Beard“ that discussed the effects of gender inequality on Wall Street and why the blog author, [...]

Comment on Blogging will not change every business…but it will change many by Social Media and Business | Biz Gov Soc

Social Media and Business | Biz Gov Soc — Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:44:57 +0000

[...] by BusinessWeek titled “Social Media Will Change Your Business.” The Post can be found here. The original article states that social media will change the way that businesses can interact [...]

Comment on Socialnomics: The Social Media Revolution by The Geekery Online » Socialommerce and Socialnomics — Actual Words For What We All Do

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:13:21 +0000

[...] Socialnomics: The Social Media Revolution (blorgtheory.com) [...]

Comment on Lou Pai: The Only Guy Who’s Ever Been Lucky to Get Divorced by Inside - In the Know

Inside - In the Know — Sat, 19 Feb 2011 16:59:46 +0000

Congratulations to Derek………the first , seemingly in the Country to suggest the obvious…..The Truth will come out someday…..it is in court docs that show Pai NEVER HAD TO SELL ANY ENRON STOCK which was 100% sold BEFORE HIS DIVORCE, so how could there be Divorce terms requiring his stock to be sold ?…….!!!!!

BTW….that “$30 mil”….was paid by Enrons Director / Officer liability policy…..it cost Pai , nothing!
The Country should be outraged at what he and Lana Lee (Pai) have pulled off………